inflammation reduction with enzymes

Inflammation, blood coagulation and fibrosis can be reduced with
certain bacterial enzymes fairly quickly. According to a blood
expert, plaque slowly disolves too.

This should be of interest to a majority of adults in the general
population and 100% of diabetics. People who realise how
inflammatory their condition is or who are concerned about
peripheral arterial disease, thrombosis, stroke or heart attack
risk, angina, cardiovascular surgery, and probably a few other
conditions should .

Because it mops up excess coagulation as it occurs an enzyme
program can remove the need for warfarin, which has a small
therapeutic range for treatment of coagulopathy and it promotes
bleeding, unlike the enzymes.

When you start to look at the research you’ll note that enzymes
have been used for awhile but it wasn’t until fairly recently
that alternatives to the mediochre bromelain and papain entered
the market. BlockBuster All Clear is an excellent example of a
synergistic blend of these.

2 Responses to “inflammation reduction with enzymes”

  1. Dave Smith Says:

    Duncan,
    Thanks - I do not have any of those issues. No plaque, my BP is
    102/78. Cortisol itself is inflammatory and is what I was referring to
    by an "inflamamtory state", and that can not be reduced by any easy method.
    My lessening inflammatory state is due to homeopathy having reduced the
    cortisol from carcinoid tumours from 320 to about 149 currently per day
    (heading for a normal of 10).
    The mere presence in the system of such high cortisol is usually
    deadly over a few years. I eat a very anti-inflammatory diet along with
    the homeopathy to beat this.

    However - what bacterial enzymes are you referring to, and why would one
    use them from bacteria instead of having the body make them from raw
    materials?
    I assume they are proteolytic, which I know from my own research does

    damage in any amount other than exactly what’s needed. It’s why I
    generally do not recommend enzymes but rather the nutrients the body
    uses to make them as needed.

    > This should be of interest to a majority of adults in the general
    > population and 100% of diabetics.

    Why?
    I agree that fighting cell level inflammation is the objective but
    that does not necessarily make bacterial enzymes the way to do it.
    Antioxidant foods are a lot safer, tastier, and more normal to the body,
    and are every bit as powerful chemically, and will not do the wrong
    things in the body.

    I HAD all those things and others - till I changed my diet (and added
    homeopathy).
    I did have PAD, it’s gone now - all it needs is Vit E high dose with
    fish oil and an anti-inflammatory diet.
    I had heart attacks and BP 210/165. That came right the same way plus
    homeopathy - to now a BP of 102/78.

    Vit E is IMO far safer along with fish oil and spinach - and there is
    IMO NEVER a good place for rat poison in humans (warfarin, coumadin etc)

    > When you start to look at the research you’ll note that enzymes
    > have been used for awhile

    Never safely.
    I was one of the proteolytic enzyme researchers - from way back in the
    70S, so yes I know they are old news - but not all good news. Researched
    12 of them, including bromelein and papain, the ones you mention - they
    are very nasty chemicals, IMO not toys to mess with instead of proper
    nutrients.

    Proteolytic means they split proteins - but there is no way they know
    what proteins to split and which ones to leave alone. It’s not like they
    have a guidance system.

    ????
    Easy to make a mixture and sell it.
    Where’s the proof of what the enzymes do in the body?
    Even in rabbits they were unsafe, causing side effect damage to
    cartilage for example. You could not pay me to eat the stuff over
    healthy alternatives.

    Namaste,
    Irene

  2. Dave Black Says:

    I’m referring to the fibrinolytic enzymes serrapeptase and
    nattokinase; these are quite specific to breaking down the fibrin
    in clots.

    The reason you’d use fibrinolytics is that production of one’s
    only fibrinolytic enzyme, plasmin, drops significantly with age;
    some of the research is on my website.

    Nattokinase is about 4 times as powerful as plasmin and it
    apparently jacks up one’s own sagging plasmin production as well.
    The outcome is less inflammation, less thombosis, less blood
    coagulation, and less fibrois in inflammatory disease and as one
    ages. They are heart attack and stroke risk reducers.

    They are much better than proteolytics for this job, they are

    specifically fibrinolytics, about an exact match for what you
    want to accomplish. Serrapeptase and nattokinase apparently don’t
    cause damage even at fairly high doses.

    To answer your question on nutrients, natural plasmin production
    drops with age regardless of adequate nutrients being available.
    As plasmin is your only fibrinolytic enzyme, when it drops,
    clotting and inflammation increase.

    Antioxidants do not address this cause of inflammation. I’m a big
    fan of keeping the antioxidant pool up; that being said your
    natural plasmin, and supplemental serapeptase and nattokinase,
    reduce thrombois, blood coagulation and fibrosis, functions that
    are not directly covered by antioxidants.

    These two fibrinolytic enzymes have been shown to be safe enough
    that they can be purchased OTC and used as directed by people
    with no experience.

    Vitamin E and garlic are not OTC fibrinolytic enzymes that will
    dissolve clots; they work a different way and I agree - use ‘em.

    I won’t comment on the rest of your post because your negative
    past experience resulted in assumptions that don’t appear to
    apply.

    We can pick it up later if you like; for now, it will suffice to
    say that a diabetic’s peripheral arterial disease and resulting
    neuropathy and purple toes, can be prevented, and the circulatory
    issues reduced or eliminated, in just days to a few weeks.

    For many, that means avoiding amputation, which is still the
    preferred medical ‘cure’ for this condition. I think the medical
    machine would have to agree that the risk of amputation is a much
    bigger risk than that produced by a few OTC enzymes that are
    generally recognised to be pretty safe.

    If anyone has drug-resistant foot and leg ulcers, they might like
    to know that these also can be pretty quickly cured without
    resorting to the most popular medical ‘cure’, that being leg
    amputation. The smaller ulcers respond readily to topical
    applications of ozonated olive oil, and the larger ones, to limb
    bagging with oxygen/ozone gas at home, or bio-oxidative IV by a
    naturopath.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.