<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Type 1</title>
	<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/</link>
	<description>Some tips for diabetic, recipes and products.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11593</link>
		<author>John Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11593</guid>
		<description>Hi Liz,

My take on CHI is that they are a raw foods lifestyle organization.
They utilize high amounts of wheat grass juice, sprouts, and all types
of raw fruits and vegetables. Not all raw fruits/smoothies would be
great for a type 1 diabetic's blood sugar. So these I would
definitely limit or avoid completely in the beginning. The longer on
the raw veg diet, the more stabilized the blood sugar begins to be.
At this point the needs for insulin are really low and sometimes are
not needed by the patient any more. You definitely would need to have
your physician take a look at a daily menu to determine (guess)
insulin needs. It will change while you are their I am betting.

The Bouytenko boy was pretty much eating any type of fruit or
vegetable as long as it was raw. It took a few months for his blood
&lt;!--more--&gt;
sugar to stabilize according to their book. Would it have been faster
without the sweet fruits? I don't know, they believe the body craves
what it needs. In his case he craved mangoes, which Bernard Jensen
confirmed would help his pancreas heal. (I also crave mangoes!)

Dr Bernstein would be a great resource/team member for you. He knows
how to keep the numbers in line and how to use the least amount of
insulin which is very important in the long run. As far as ending
insulin use, I don't know that he is there yet with Type 1's, he
certainly is with type 2's.

Another resource to consider is Dr Young's place. He does 1 week
retreats where he and his staff analyze your blood and determine the
apprpriate course of action for you and for your daughter. Because of
his success with getting type 1's off of insulin, he might he the best
resource, but the whole cure might not happen in a week. (but it
might! dont want to negate the possibilites) He also would be able to
advise how to adjust food intake and suggest insulin reduction
strategies.

If you have the time and resources, I suggest you go for it and
immerse yourself and your daughter in healing. By taking yourself
away from the day to day stuff, you can really focus in a healing. Dr
Schulze tells people in his &#34;incurables&#34; program, that their
occupation for the next 30 or 60 or 90 days is healing. He advises to
take a leave of absence from work, school, whatever and get to the
business of healing. I think this is very wise and comes from working
with thousands of patients who were told they were &#34;incurable.&#34;

Brock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Liz,</p>
<p>My take on CHI is that they are a raw foods lifestyle organization.<br />
They utilize high amounts of wheat grass juice, sprouts, and all types<br />
of raw fruits and vegetables. Not all raw fruits/smoothies would be<br />
great for a type 1 diabetic&#8217;s blood sugar. So these I would<br />
definitely limit or avoid completely in the beginning. The longer on<br />
the raw veg diet, the more stabilized the blood sugar begins to be.<br />
At this point the needs for insulin are really low and sometimes are<br />
not needed by the patient any more. You definitely would need to have<br />
your physician take a look at a daily menu to determine (guess)<br />
insulin needs. It will change while you are their I am betting.</p>
<p>The Bouytenko boy was pretty much eating any type of fruit or<br />
vegetable as long as it was raw. It took a few months for his blood<br />
<!--more--><br />
sugar to stabilize according to their book. Would it have been faster<br />
without the sweet fruits? I don&#8217;t know, they believe the body craves<br />
what it needs. In his case he craved mangoes, which Bernard Jensen<br />
confirmed would help his pancreas heal. (I also crave mangoes!)</p>
<p>Dr Bernstein would be a great resource/team member for you. He knows<br />
how to keep the numbers in line and how to use the least amount of<br />
insulin which is very important in the long run. As far as ending<br />
insulin use, I don&#8217;t know that he is there yet with Type 1&#8217;s, he<br />
certainly is with type 2&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Another resource to consider is Dr Young&#8217;s place. He does 1 week<br />
retreats where he and his staff analyze your blood and determine the<br />
apprpriate course of action for you and for your daughter. Because of<br />
his success with getting type 1&#8217;s off of insulin, he might he the best<br />
resource, but the whole cure might not happen in a week. (but it<br />
might! dont want to negate the possibilites) He also would be able to<br />
advise how to adjust food intake and suggest insulin reduction<br />
strategies.</p>
<p>If you have the time and resources, I suggest you go for it and<br />
immerse yourself and your daughter in healing. By taking yourself<br />
away from the day to day stuff, you can really focus in a healing. Dr<br />
Schulze tells people in his &quot;incurables&quot; program, that their<br />
occupation for the next 30 or 60 or 90 days is healing. He advises to<br />
take a leave of absence from work, school, whatever and get to the<br />
business of healing. I think this is very wise and comes from working<br />
with thousands of patients who were told they were &quot;incurable.&quot;</p>
<p>Brock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11586</link>
		<author>John Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11586</guid>
		<description>Brock , I looked at Bernaars site . Very Interesting
. I liked his thing on healing all diseases from that
list , which pretty much describes the whole concept
of healing reactions.
I picked up Bernsteins book from Barnes and Nobles ,
and decided to buy it . I don't know if you were one
of the ones who recommended it .
If you were I have some questions /thoughts , you
might have some responses to.
He says that one has to reduce insulin when about to
embark on his low carb/ low sugar inducing carb, diet
. OK. Makes sense. (and that prior to starting ,it's
essential to keep good records of carbs, BS and
insulin and excercise. O.K. ) This would all be
necessary before puting my daughter in any &#34;program&#34;.
&lt;!--more--&gt;
If I take my daughter off to the Creative HEalth
Institute(the Ann Wigmore place in Michigan) and her
doctor knows that she is going to be &#34;veging&#34; for two
weeks , the doc should be able to set her Lantus (24
hr shot)accordingly and her novolog accordingly,
right? I would hope so . There is no medical
supervision at the Institute.
The only issue We may have with the Creative Health
Institute is that it does seem to mainly deal with
cancer, and therefore the issue of food (juices and
smoothies)inducing sugar highs may not be as
scrutinized as it could be. Even tho they do have a
handful of diabetics coming through every year of both
types , they say totally eliminating insulin is still
an issue, whereas Dr Bernstein says it needn't be.
They put fruit in the vegie smoothies because they are
more palatable that way , while Bernstein advises no
fruit, period , it's just too sugary and one can get
all the vitamins through veg.
If we can customize our own vegetable smoothies with
stevia for sweetness then it would be O&#62;K. The
concern I have is that since smoothies by nature are
processed , they are going to be more sugar inducing
for the blood than whole unprocessed veg, and therefor
the therapeutic effect of eating alot of veg would be
countered by the fact that it would still demand
insulin , if it was in the form of a smoothie.
The institute does recommennd the Vitamix which
retains the fiber , over straight juicers , and fiber
is really necessary to slow the rate of sugar going
into the blood.
But overall maybe the Institute is not really as
logically geared as it could be towards diabetes
recovery . I still need to talk to them about these
details . Bernstein does not even mention smoothies as
far as I can see, perhaps because of this . He does
say to stay away from all juices.
On sugar being in the blood when no eating is
taking place ,he observes the following: Bernstein
(type1)says he himself takes no insulin as such ,
but that if he &#34;fasted&#34; (my words ) for 18 hours he
would take a slow acting insulin, becasue otherwise ,
as I understand it , his blood sugar would be up in
the morning , (The Dawn Phenomenon), because he says
the liver would deactivate the circulating insulin .
(Someone else said recently on this board that the
liver actually throws out sugar during &#34;fasting&#34;
because it tries to provide the body with fuel/sugar
at that time ,ie if you go more than 3/4hours without
new food/fuel/a meal- another interpretation for dawn
phenomenon? )
What are your takes /experiences with any of this.
Could you ever imagine yourself to be insulin free.
Bernstein lives in Mamaronek &#60; Ny , not tooo far from
me in Jersey.
I think I will see if I can communicate with him .
Maybe he can also recommend a
nutritionist/endochrinologist who is working on the
same lines as himself , for my daughter.
Liz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brock , I looked at Bernaars site . Very Interesting<br />
. I liked his thing on healing all diseases from that<br />
list , which pretty much describes the whole concept<br />
of healing reactions.<br />
I picked up Bernsteins book from Barnes and Nobles ,<br />
and decided to buy it . I don&#8217;t know if you were one<br />
of the ones who recommended it .<br />
If you were I have some questions /thoughts , you<br />
might have some responses to.<br />
He says that one has to reduce insulin when about to<br />
embark on his low carb/ low sugar inducing carb, diet<br />
. OK. Makes sense. (and that prior to starting ,it&#8217;s<br />
essential to keep good records of carbs, BS and<br />
insulin and excercise. O.K. ) This would all be<br />
necessary before puting my daughter in any &quot;program&quot;.<br />
<!--more--><br />
If I take my daughter off to the Creative HEalth<br />
Institute(the Ann Wigmore place in Michigan) and her<br />
doctor knows that she is going to be &quot;veging&quot; for two<br />
weeks , the doc should be able to set her Lantus (24<br />
hr shot)accordingly and her novolog accordingly,<br />
right? I would hope so . There is no medical<br />
supervision at the Institute.<br />
The only issue We may have with the Creative Health<br />
Institute is that it does seem to mainly deal with<br />
cancer, and therefore the issue of food (juices and<br />
smoothies)inducing sugar highs may not be as<br />
scrutinized as it could be. Even tho they do have a<br />
handful of diabetics coming through every year of both<br />
types , they say totally eliminating insulin is still<br />
an issue, whereas Dr Bernstein says it needn&#8217;t be.<br />
They put fruit in the vegie smoothies because they are<br />
more palatable that way , while Bernstein advises no<br />
fruit, period , it&#8217;s just too sugary and one can get<br />
all the vitamins through veg.<br />
If we can customize our own vegetable smoothies with<br />
stevia for sweetness then it would be O&gt;K. The<br />
concern I have is that since smoothies by nature are<br />
processed , they are going to be more sugar inducing<br />
for the blood than whole unprocessed veg, and therefor<br />
the therapeutic effect of eating alot of veg would be<br />
countered by the fact that it would still demand<br />
insulin , if it was in the form of a smoothie.<br />
The institute does recommennd the Vitamix which<br />
retains the fiber , over straight juicers , and fiber<br />
is really necessary to slow the rate of sugar going<br />
into the blood.<br />
But overall maybe the Institute is not really as<br />
logically geared as it could be towards diabetes<br />
recovery . I still need to talk to them about these<br />
details . Bernstein does not even mention smoothies as<br />
far as I can see, perhaps because of this . He does<br />
say to stay away from all juices.<br />
On sugar being in the blood when no eating is<br />
taking place ,he observes the following: Bernstein<br />
(type1)says he himself takes no insulin as such ,<br />
but that if he &quot;fasted&quot; (my words ) for 18 hours he<br />
would take a slow acting insulin, becasue otherwise ,<br />
as I understand it , his blood sugar would be up in<br />
the morning , (The Dawn Phenomenon), because he says<br />
the liver would deactivate the circulating insulin .<br />
(Someone else said recently on this board that the<br />
liver actually throws out sugar during &quot;fasting&quot;<br />
because it tries to provide the body with fuel/sugar<br />
at that time ,ie if you go more than 3/4hours without<br />
new food/fuel/a meal- another interpretation for dawn<br />
phenomenon? )<br />
What are your takes /experiences with any of this.<br />
Could you ever imagine yourself to be insulin free.<br />
Bernstein lives in Mamaronek &lt; Ny , not tooo far from<br />
me in Jersey.<br />
I think I will see if I can communicate with him .<br />
Maybe he can also recommend a<br />
nutritionist/endochrinologist who is working on the<br />
same lines as himself , for my daughter.<br />
Liz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11541</link>
		<author>John Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 02:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11541</guid>
		<description>Liz,

He is unique to say the least, but definitely a sincere guy. His
ideas are very contradictory to conventional thought, even some
&#34;natural healing&#34; conventional thought.

All the best,

Brock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>He is unique to say the least, but definitely a sincere guy. His<br />
ideas are very contradictory to conventional thought, even some<br />
&quot;natural healing&quot; conventional thought.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Brock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11538</link>
		<author>John Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 06:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11538</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Welcome to the group!

To answer your question: Yes, I am insulin dependant.

The lowest insulin levels that I have needed have coincided with a
vegan diet, and the elimanation of grain four products.

At times I have gone vegan, all raw as well, but I have found eating
this way tough to say the least. The longest I have strictly
maintained this (no cooked food) was about a month. During this time
my insulin requirements were 85-90% less than previously needed with
cooked foods.

&lt;!--more--&gt;
I believe it takes about 6 months to 1 year of very strict eating,
exercising and general stress relief to cause a type 1 diabetic to go
back to non-diabetic status. (certain herbs might help expedite the
process) The complete weaning off of insulin also seems to be an
issue because the final 10%-15% insulin is hard to eliminate. Dr
Bernarr advocates water fasting at this point to allow the body to
reset itself. He also advocates all raw, vegan, much anaerobic
exercise and much rest during the healing process. He does say there
is no set amount of time, all people being different.

All the best,

Brock

PS. For the first 11 years of my type 1 diabetic condition, I
exercised almost always 6 days per week with both strength and aerobic
exercise. During this time I rarely had high blood sugar and I pretty
much ate anything I wanted. In fact I was always chasing low blood
sugar with more food. About 4 years after ending this rigorous
exercise regimen, I began to experience high blood sugar more
regularly in the morning or spikes at times during the day. Amazing
that it took 4 years to catch up. Bernstein and Bernaar both advocate
anaerobic exercise (sugar burning like weight lifting, sprinting,
etc). Young advocates aerobic exclusively because the anerobic leaves
a acidic waste product in the body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Welcome to the group!</p>
<p>To answer your question: Yes, I am insulin dependant.</p>
<p>The lowest insulin levels that I have needed have coincided with a<br />
vegan diet, and the elimanation of grain four products.</p>
<p>At times I have gone vegan, all raw as well, but I have found eating<br />
this way tough to say the least. The longest I have strictly<br />
maintained this (no cooked food) was about a month. During this time<br />
my insulin requirements were 85-90% less than previously needed with<br />
cooked foods.</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
I believe it takes about 6 months to 1 year of very strict eating,<br />
exercising and general stress relief to cause a type 1 diabetic to go<br />
back to non-diabetic status. (certain herbs might help expedite the<br />
process) The complete weaning off of insulin also seems to be an<br />
issue because the final 10%-15% insulin is hard to eliminate. Dr<br />
Bernarr advocates water fasting at this point to allow the body to<br />
reset itself. He also advocates all raw, vegan, much anaerobic<br />
exercise and much rest during the healing process. He does say there<br />
is no set amount of time, all people being different.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Brock</p>
<p>PS. For the first 11 years of my type 1 diabetic condition, I<br />
exercised almost always 6 days per week with both strength and aerobic<br />
exercise. During this time I rarely had high blood sugar and I pretty<br />
much ate anything I wanted. In fact I was always chasing low blood<br />
sugar with more food. About 4 years after ending this rigorous<br />
exercise regimen, I began to experience high blood sugar more<br />
regularly in the morning or spikes at times during the day. Amazing<br />
that it took 4 years to catch up. Bernstein and Bernaar both advocate<br />
anaerobic exercise (sugar burning like weight lifting, sprinting,<br />
etc). Young advocates aerobic exclusively because the anerobic leaves<br />
a acidic waste product in the body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endy Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11513</link>
		<author>Endy Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11513</guid>
		<description>I'd like to think so, but it was only the generation using homeopathy
that had those statistics. Well maybe earlier ones but I have no data.
My gran's group of 13 ate a lot of meat which they farmed themselves. My
dad's generation was anti homeopathy thanks to him (it failed to do as
he wanted at age 14 or some such) and while they had a similar diet of
own-farmed meat and produce they all died at between 78 and 84.
I came upon homeopathy late in life as a result of the
anti-homeopathy attitude of my dad, and my health sucks at 57.

Oh I see, aren't you afraid of contaminating the city sewer:-))
I'm actually honest with my current doc, she knows better than to offer
me a Rx for anything I won't use. I have only Rxs for potassium,
magnesium and Novolog. I can't do that with the specialists.....

&#62; i'm working toward a
&lt;!--more--&gt;
&#62; chia gel

Educate me here please - what is chia gel?

Sounds intertesting, is it working to do that?

:0-))

I am not happy in the 70s, or at least not below 78. My best compromise
seems to be around 84-89 probably due to a combination of factors: Blood
pressure not high (102/78) and 6 foot 3 height to pump to; and kidneys
that toss out K and Mg instead of Na so that my muscles cave in if I am
late or miss a dose. Hypoglycemia with hypokalemia makes one quite
collapsible:-))

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc, AASCA, MCSSA, D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
Proverb:Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it.

By reading the messages of this group you agree to hold yourself FULLY
responsible FOR yourself.
Have a nice day !

SPONSORED LINKS
Diabetes supplies Diabetes test strips Diabetes Diabetes testing
supply Diabetes product Diabetes treatment

Visit your group &#34;diabetescured&#34; on the web.

---------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to think so, but it was only the generation using homeopathy<br />
that had those statistics. Well maybe earlier ones but I have no data.<br />
My gran&#8217;s group of 13 ate a lot of meat which they farmed themselves. My<br />
dad&#8217;s generation was anti homeopathy thanks to him (it failed to do as<br />
he wanted at age 14 or some such) and while they had a similar diet of<br />
own-farmed meat and produce they all died at between 78 and 84.<br />
I came upon homeopathy late in life as a result of the<br />
anti-homeopathy attitude of my dad, and my health sucks at 57.</p>
<p>Oh I see, aren&#8217;t you afraid of contaminating the city sewer:-))<br />
I&#8217;m actually honest with my current doc, she knows better than to offer<br />
me a Rx for anything I won&#8217;t use. I have only Rxs for potassium,<br />
magnesium and Novolog. I can&#8217;t do that with the specialists&#8230;..</p>
<p>&gt; i&#8217;m working toward a<br />
<!--more--><br />
&gt; chia gel</p>
<p>Educate me here please - what is chia gel?</p>
<p>Sounds intertesting, is it working to do that?</p>
<p>:0-))</p>
<p>I am not happy in the 70s, or at least not below 78. My best compromise<br />
seems to be around 84-89 probably due to a combination of factors: Blood<br />
pressure not high (102/78) and 6 foot 3 height to pump to; and kidneys<br />
that toss out K and Mg instead of Na so that my muscles cave in if I am<br />
late or miss a dose. Hypoglycemia with hypokalemia makes one quite<br />
collapsible:-))</p>
<p>Namaste,<br />
Irene<br />
&#8211;<br />
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc, AASCA, MCSSA, D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.<br />
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.<br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html" rel="nofollow">www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html</a> (Veterinary Homeopath.)<br />
Proverb:Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it.</p>
<p>By reading the messages of this group you agree to hold yourself FULLY<br />
responsible FOR yourself.<br />
Have a nice day !</p>
<p>SPONSORED LINKS<br />
Diabetes supplies Diabetes test strips Diabetes Diabetes testing<br />
supply Diabetes product Diabetes treatment</p>
<p>Visit your group &quot;diabetescured&quot; on the web.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11511</link>
		<author>Dave Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11511</guid>
		<description>I'd like to think so, but it was only the generation using homeopathy
that had those statistics. Well maybe earlier ones but I have no data.
My gran's group of 13 ate a lot of meat which they farmed themselves. My
dad's generation was anti homeopathy thanks to him (it failed to do as
he wanted at age 14 or some such) and while they had a similar diet of
own-farmed meat and produce they all died at between 78 and 84.
I came upon homeopathy late in life as a result of the
anti-homeopathy attitude of my dad, and my health sucks at 57.

Oh I see, aren't you afraid of contaminating the city sewer:-))
I'm actually honest with my current doc, she knows better than to offer
me a Rx for anything I won't use. I have only Rxs for potassium,
magnesium and Novolog. I can't do that with the specialists.....

&#62; i'm working toward a
&lt;!--more--&gt;
&#62; chia gel

Educate me here please - what is chia gel?

Sounds intertesting, is it working to do that?

:0-))

I am not happy in the 70s, or at least not below 78. My best compromise
seems to be around 84-89 probably due to a combination of factors: Blood
pressure not high (102/78) and 6 foot 3 height to pump to; and kidneys
that toss out K and Mg instead of Na so that my muscles cave in if I am
late or miss a dose. Hypoglycemia with hypokalemia makes one quite
collapsible:-))

Namaste,
Irene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to think so, but it was only the generation using homeopathy<br />
that had those statistics. Well maybe earlier ones but I have no data.<br />
My gran&#8217;s group of 13 ate a lot of meat which they farmed themselves. My<br />
dad&#8217;s generation was anti homeopathy thanks to him (it failed to do as<br />
he wanted at age 14 or some such) and while they had a similar diet of<br />
own-farmed meat and produce they all died at between 78 and 84.<br />
I came upon homeopathy late in life as a result of the<br />
anti-homeopathy attitude of my dad, and my health sucks at 57.</p>
<p>Oh I see, aren&#8217;t you afraid of contaminating the city sewer:-))<br />
I&#8217;m actually honest with my current doc, she knows better than to offer<br />
me a Rx for anything I won&#8217;t use. I have only Rxs for potassium,<br />
magnesium and Novolog. I can&#8217;t do that with the specialists&#8230;..</p>
<p>&gt; i&#8217;m working toward a<br />
<!--more--><br />
&gt; chia gel</p>
<p>Educate me here please - what is chia gel?</p>
<p>Sounds intertesting, is it working to do that?</p>
<p>:0-))</p>
<p>I am not happy in the 70s, or at least not below 78. My best compromise<br />
seems to be around 84-89 probably due to a combination of factors: Blood<br />
pressure not high (102/78) and 6 foot 3 height to pump to; and kidneys<br />
that toss out K and Mg instead of Na so that my muscles cave in if I am<br />
late or miss a dose. Hypoglycemia with hypokalemia makes one quite<br />
collapsible:-))</p>
<p>Namaste,<br />
Irene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endy Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11508</link>
		<author>Endy Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11508</guid>
		<description>i've been wrong before.
maybe doctors DO go to medical school
so they can Lie, and Kill, and Loot.
they are mostly republicans, after all.
just kidding.
i do not think dr's are omnipotent or even
necessairily right all the time.
they are just not as Totally Useless as some
believe.
105. wow. that's a respectable run by anybody's
standards. it's as much a tribute to genetics as to
avoiding allopathy in all forms. genetically speaking,
you have fantastic propsects for prolonged duration.
i listen carefully to my dr's advice on the importance
of getting enough exercise and i take the metformin
&lt;!--more--&gt;
she gives me and flush them. i'm working toward a
chia gel based nutrient substance, flavourable by what
ever is consistent with a raw foods diet, that keeps my l
numbers in the 70's and 80's.
i'm not a total dope.
very often.
ish.
Dennis

It's not always anecdotal in that it is science based, unlike what the
doctors are recommending which is grain-company based.

The food pyramid is a political thing after all, sponsored by General
mills and Monsanto - grain growers. It's nothing to do with health or
science but it is behind the American Diabetes Assoc recommendations.
the ADA recommendations have a statistical record of INCREASING diabetes
complications and INCREASING the number of diabetics diagnosed. That's
hardly a recommendation for their approach! Yet that is the approach ALL
doctors are taught and expected to use.

The real science is in books like Dr Bernstein's Diabetes Solution, Dr
PErricone's anti-inflammatory research results etc., THIS is truly
science based, as opposed to politically based.

We as consumers need to remove the blinkers that we were told to wear -
the ones that say doctors are invincible and have all the answers. the
results prove otherwise.

If she was cured, why does it bother you how it occurred?
Mind over matter has been proven to overcome cancer in many ways already.

&#62; i just think of how much longer they could have stayed around
&#62; if they'd had a little better sense.

No you don't. You are assuming without any evidence that they would stay
around longer with doctors in the picture. the reverse is the case for
diabetes and most chronic diseases. (Doctors are good at other things,
not chronic diseases.) My grandmother and her 13 siblings who used
homeopathy and not doctors, lived to an average age of 105. How much
longer did you want THEM to live then?

&#62; if you don't trust your dr, find another one. some are better than others.

I agree with the principle of having a good doctor from whom to get
opinions. But I disagree with the idea of believing the opinions
blindly. an individual choice is more appropriate - one which uses ALL
the available information and opinions - not only a doctor's well meant
but off track ideas. The choice needs to make scientific sense and the
results from a chosen approach need to hold up over time - which ADA
recommendations from ANY doctors do not:-))

It's the fact that ADA recommendations have PROVEN to cause harm (by
their own statistics!), that make it necessary and wise to look at other
options. Unless yo have a Doctor like Perricone, Bernstein, Young etc,
you are not so wise to just follow a doctor blindly. THEIR bad results
are not just anecdotal!

&#62; but for heaven sake don't trust antecdotal evidence alone on this subject.
&#62; remember you are reading the exceptions, not necessairily the norms.

You are assuming that these are exceptions. But they are not. ALL the
folks using scinece-based NON-conventional approach are getting well,
not just a few exceptions.
Those who use Dr BErnstein's approach for example number thousands, and
they all benefit. It's not &#34;just anecdotal&#34; as you are suggesting.
Those who use homeopathy number millions, also not &#34;just anecdotal&#34;.

It's however the science behind the methods that is appropriate to look
at. Your above example is definitely anecdotal - the one imagining the
cancer away - but that has happened countless times, not just once, and
it will be right for some people - probably those who believe it is
right. You can't assume something is ineffective because it is not how
you expect it to look based on your environment and upbringing.

&#62; doing 'whatever' might cure diabetes, but it's probably wiser to place
&#62; your bet on treatment and control and learning to live with it.

&#34;Learning to live with it&#34; has to be an aspect of any current day - but
if you do not aim to repair it at a future time, you never will!
It's like trying to get a bullseye when you don't look towards the
target:-))) Won't happen.
To succeed in getting rid of diabetes, you actually have to work at
doing just that:-)))
I would never advise someone to &#34;just live with it&#34; rather than taking
action towards achieving an improved situation.

If you don't look for an improvement you will never find it:-)
As it says in my tagline &#34;Man who say it cannot be done should not
interrupt one doing it.&#34;

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc, AASCA, MCSSA, D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
Proverb:Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it.

By reading the messages of this group you agree to hold yourself FULLY
responsible FOR yourself.
Have a nice day !

SPONSORED LINKS
Diabetes supplies Diabetes test strips Diabetes Diabetes testing
supply Diabetes product Diabetes treatment

Visit your group &#34;diabetescured&#34; on the web.

---------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been wrong before.<br />
maybe doctors DO go to medical school<br />
so they can Lie, and Kill, and Loot.<br />
they are mostly republicans, after all.<br />
just kidding.<br />
i do not think dr&#8217;s are omnipotent or even<br />
necessairily right all the time.<br />
they are just not as Totally Useless as some<br />
believe.<br />
105. wow. that&#8217;s a respectable run by anybody&#8217;s<br />
standards. it&#8217;s as much a tribute to genetics as to<br />
avoiding allopathy in all forms. genetically speaking,<br />
you have fantastic propsects for prolonged duration.<br />
i listen carefully to my dr&#8217;s advice on the importance<br />
of getting enough exercise and i take the metformin<br />
<!--more--><br />
she gives me and flush them. i&#8217;m working toward a<br />
chia gel based nutrient substance, flavourable by what<br />
ever is consistent with a raw foods diet, that keeps my l<br />
numbers in the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s.<br />
i&#8217;m not a total dope.<br />
very often.<br />
ish.<br />
Dennis</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not always anecdotal in that it is science based, unlike what the<br />
doctors are recommending which is grain-company based.</p>
<p>The food pyramid is a political thing after all, sponsored by General<br />
mills and Monsanto - grain growers. It&#8217;s nothing to do with health or<br />
science but it is behind the American Diabetes Assoc recommendations.<br />
the ADA recommendations have a statistical record of INCREASING diabetes<br />
complications and INCREASING the number of diabetics diagnosed. That&#8217;s<br />
hardly a recommendation for their approach! Yet that is the approach ALL<br />
doctors are taught and expected to use.</p>
<p>The real science is in books like Dr Bernstein&#8217;s Diabetes Solution, Dr<br />
PErricone&#8217;s anti-inflammatory research results etc., THIS is truly<br />
science based, as opposed to politically based.</p>
<p>We as consumers need to remove the blinkers that we were told to wear -<br />
the ones that say doctors are invincible and have all the answers. the<br />
results prove otherwise.</p>
<p>If she was cured, why does it bother you how it occurred?<br />
Mind over matter has been proven to overcome cancer in many ways already.</p>
<p>&gt; i just think of how much longer they could have stayed around<br />
&gt; if they&#8217;d had a little better sense.</p>
<p>No you don&#8217;t. You are assuming without any evidence that they would stay<br />
around longer with doctors in the picture. the reverse is the case for<br />
diabetes and most chronic diseases. (Doctors are good at other things,<br />
not chronic diseases.) My grandmother and her 13 siblings who used<br />
homeopathy and not doctors, lived to an average age of 105. How much<br />
longer did you want THEM to live then?</p>
<p>&gt; if you don&#8217;t trust your dr, find another one. some are better than others.</p>
<p>I agree with the principle of having a good doctor from whom to get<br />
opinions. But I disagree with the idea of believing the opinions<br />
blindly. an individual choice is more appropriate - one which uses ALL<br />
the available information and opinions - not only a doctor&#8217;s well meant<br />
but off track ideas. The choice needs to make scientific sense and the<br />
results from a chosen approach need to hold up over time - which ADA<br />
recommendations from ANY doctors do not:-))</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the fact that ADA recommendations have PROVEN to cause harm (by<br />
their own statistics!), that make it necessary and wise to look at other<br />
options. Unless yo have a Doctor like Perricone, Bernstein, Young etc,<br />
you are not so wise to just follow a doctor blindly. THEIR bad results<br />
are not just anecdotal!</p>
<p>&gt; but for heaven sake don&#8217;t trust antecdotal evidence alone on this subject.<br />
&gt; remember you are reading the exceptions, not necessairily the norms.</p>
<p>You are assuming that these are exceptions. But they are not. ALL the<br />
folks using scinece-based NON-conventional approach are getting well,<br />
not just a few exceptions.<br />
Those who use Dr BErnstein&#8217;s approach for example number thousands, and<br />
they all benefit. It&#8217;s not &quot;just anecdotal&quot; as you are suggesting.<br />
Those who use homeopathy number millions, also not &quot;just anecdotal&quot;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s however the science behind the methods that is appropriate to look<br />
at. Your above example is definitely anecdotal - the one imagining the<br />
cancer away - but that has happened countless times, not just once, and<br />
it will be right for some people - probably those who believe it is<br />
right. You can&#8217;t assume something is ineffective because it is not how<br />
you expect it to look based on your environment and upbringing.</p>
<p>&gt; doing &#8216;whatever&#8217; might cure diabetes, but it&#8217;s probably wiser to place<br />
&gt; your bet on treatment and control and learning to live with it.</p>
<p>&quot;Learning to live with it&quot; has to be an aspect of any current day - but<br />
if you do not aim to repair it at a future time, you never will!<br />
It&#8217;s like trying to get a bullseye when you don&#8217;t look towards the<br />
target:-))) Won&#8217;t happen.<br />
To succeed in getting rid of diabetes, you actually have to work at<br />
doing just that:-)))<br />
I would never advise someone to &quot;just live with it&quot; rather than taking<br />
action towards achieving an improved situation.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t look for an improvement you will never find it:-)<br />
As it says in my tagline &quot;Man who say it cannot be done should not<br />
interrupt one doing it.&quot;</p>
<p>Namaste,<br />
Irene<br />
&#8211;<br />
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc, AASCA, MCSSA, D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.<br />
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.<br />
<a href="http://www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html" rel="nofollow">www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html</a> (Veterinary Homeopath.)<br />
Proverb:Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it.</p>
<p>By reading the messages of this group you agree to hold yourself FULLY<br />
responsible FOR yourself.<br />
Have a nice day !</p>
<p>SPONSORED LINKS<br />
Diabetes supplies Diabetes test strips Diabetes Diabetes testing<br />
supply Diabetes product Diabetes treatment</p>
<p>Visit your group &quot;diabetescured&quot; on the web.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11506</link>
		<author>Dave Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11506</guid>
		<description>It's not always anecdotal in that it is science based, unlike what the
doctors are recommending which is grain-company based.

The food pyramid is a political thing after all, sponsored by General
mills and Monsanto - grain growers. It's nothing to do with health or
science but it is behind the American Diabetes Assoc recommendations.
the ADA recommendations have a statistical record of INCREASING diabetes
complications and INCREASING the number of diabetics diagnosed. That's
hardly a recommendation for their approach! Yet that is the approach ALL
doctors are taught and expected to use.

The real science is in books like Dr Bernstein's Diabetes Solution, Dr
PErricone's anti-inflammatory research results etc., THIS is truly
science based, as opposed to politically based.

&lt;!--more--&gt;
We as consumers need to remove the blinkers that we were told to wear -
the ones that say doctors are invincible and have all the answers. the
results prove otherwise.

If she was cured, why does it bother you how it occurred?
Mind over matter has been proven to overcome cancer in many ways already.

&#62; i just think of how much longer they could have stayed around
&#62; if they'd had a little better sense.

No you don't. You are assuming without any evidence that they would stay
around longer with doctors in the picture. the reverse is the case for
diabetes and most chronic diseases. (Doctors are good at other things,
not chronic diseases.) My grandmother and her 13 siblings who used
homeopathy and not doctors, lived to an average age of 105. How much
longer did you want THEM to live then?

&#62; if you don't trust your dr, find another one. some are better than others.

I agree with the principle of having a good doctor from whom to get
opinions. But I disagree with the idea of believing the opinions
blindly. an individual choice is more appropriate - one which uses ALL
the available information and opinions - not only a doctor's well meant
but off track ideas. The choice needs to make scientific sense and the
results from a chosen approach need to hold up over time - which ADA
recommendations from ANY doctors do not:-))

It's the fact that ADA recommendations have PROVEN to cause harm (by
their own statistics!), that make it necessary and wise to look at other
options. Unless yo have a Doctor like Perricone, Bernstein, Young etc,
you are not so wise to just follow a doctor blindly. THEIR bad results
are not just anecdotal!

&#62; but for heaven sake don't trust antecdotal evidence alone on this subject.
&#62; remember you are reading the exceptions, not necessairily the norms.

You are assuming that these are exceptions. But they are not. ALL the
folks using scinece-based NON-conventional approach are getting well,
not just a few exceptions.
Those who use Dr BErnstein's approach for example number thousands, and
they all benefit. It's not &#34;just anecdotal&#34; as you are suggesting.
Those who use homeopathy number millions, also not &#34;just anecdotal&#34;.

It's however the science behind the methods that is appropriate to look
at. Your above example is definitely anecdotal - the one imagining the
cancer away - but that has happened countless times, not just once, and
it will be right for some people - probably those who believe it is
right. You can't assume something is ineffective because it is not how
you expect it to look based on your environment and upbringing.

&#62; doing 'whatever' might cure diabetes, but it's probably wiser to place
&#62; your bet on treatment and control and learning to live with it.

&#34;Learning to live with it&#34; has to be an aspect of any current day - but
if you do not aim to repair it at a future time, you never will!
It's like trying to get a bullseye when you don't look towards the
target:-))) Won't happen.
To succeed in getting rid of diabetes, you actually have to work at
doing just that:-)))
I would never advise someone to &#34;just live with it&#34; rather than taking
action towards achieving an improved situation.

If you don't look for an improvement you will never find it:-)
As it says in my tagline &#34;Man who say it cannot be done should not
interrupt one doing it.&#34;

Namaste,
Irene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not always anecdotal in that it is science based, unlike what the<br />
doctors are recommending which is grain-company based.</p>
<p>The food pyramid is a political thing after all, sponsored by General<br />
mills and Monsanto - grain growers. It&#8217;s nothing to do with health or<br />
science but it is behind the American Diabetes Assoc recommendations.<br />
the ADA recommendations have a statistical record of INCREASING diabetes<br />
complications and INCREASING the number of diabetics diagnosed. That&#8217;s<br />
hardly a recommendation for their approach! Yet that is the approach ALL<br />
doctors are taught and expected to use.</p>
<p>The real science is in books like Dr Bernstein&#8217;s Diabetes Solution, Dr<br />
PErricone&#8217;s anti-inflammatory research results etc., THIS is truly<br />
science based, as opposed to politically based.</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
We as consumers need to remove the blinkers that we were told to wear -<br />
the ones that say doctors are invincible and have all the answers. the<br />
results prove otherwise.</p>
<p>If she was cured, why does it bother you how it occurred?<br />
Mind over matter has been proven to overcome cancer in many ways already.</p>
<p>&gt; i just think of how much longer they could have stayed around<br />
&gt; if they&#8217;d had a little better sense.</p>
<p>No you don&#8217;t. You are assuming without any evidence that they would stay<br />
around longer with doctors in the picture. the reverse is the case for<br />
diabetes and most chronic diseases. (Doctors are good at other things,<br />
not chronic diseases.) My grandmother and her 13 siblings who used<br />
homeopathy and not doctors, lived to an average age of 105. How much<br />
longer did you want THEM to live then?</p>
<p>&gt; if you don&#8217;t trust your dr, find another one. some are better than others.</p>
<p>I agree with the principle of having a good doctor from whom to get<br />
opinions. But I disagree with the idea of believing the opinions<br />
blindly. an individual choice is more appropriate - one which uses ALL<br />
the available information and opinions - not only a doctor&#8217;s well meant<br />
but off track ideas. The choice needs to make scientific sense and the<br />
results from a chosen approach need to hold up over time - which ADA<br />
recommendations from ANY doctors do not:-))</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the fact that ADA recommendations have PROVEN to cause harm (by<br />
their own statistics!), that make it necessary and wise to look at other<br />
options. Unless yo have a Doctor like Perricone, Bernstein, Young etc,<br />
you are not so wise to just follow a doctor blindly. THEIR bad results<br />
are not just anecdotal!</p>
<p>&gt; but for heaven sake don&#8217;t trust antecdotal evidence alone on this subject.<br />
&gt; remember you are reading the exceptions, not necessairily the norms.</p>
<p>You are assuming that these are exceptions. But they are not. ALL the<br />
folks using scinece-based NON-conventional approach are getting well,<br />
not just a few exceptions.<br />
Those who use Dr BErnstein&#8217;s approach for example number thousands, and<br />
they all benefit. It&#8217;s not &quot;just anecdotal&quot; as you are suggesting.<br />
Those who use homeopathy number millions, also not &quot;just anecdotal&quot;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s however the science behind the methods that is appropriate to look<br />
at. Your above example is definitely anecdotal - the one imagining the<br />
cancer away - but that has happened countless times, not just once, and<br />
it will be right for some people - probably those who believe it is<br />
right. You can&#8217;t assume something is ineffective because it is not how<br />
you expect it to look based on your environment and upbringing.</p>
<p>&gt; doing &#8216;whatever&#8217; might cure diabetes, but it&#8217;s probably wiser to place<br />
&gt; your bet on treatment and control and learning to live with it.</p>
<p>&quot;Learning to live with it&quot; has to be an aspect of any current day - but<br />
if you do not aim to repair it at a future time, you never will!<br />
It&#8217;s like trying to get a bullseye when you don&#8217;t look towards the<br />
target:-))) Won&#8217;t happen.<br />
To succeed in getting rid of diabetes, you actually have to work at<br />
doing just that:-)))<br />
I would never advise someone to &quot;just live with it&quot; rather than taking<br />
action towards achieving an improved situation.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t look for an improvement you will never find it:-)<br />
As it says in my tagline &quot;Man who say it cannot be done should not<br />
interrupt one doing it.&quot;</p>
<p>Namaste,<br />
Irene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11502</link>
		<author>John Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11502</guid>
		<description>Brock, I totally agree. This is what I know in my
heart , and I can't accept the establishment line for
my daughter , and I don't want her to accept it either
. It has been a really hard month , persisting with my
belief and knowledge about healing whilst watching her
go through acceptance/denial /evasion / hopelessness
about &#34;THE DIAGNOSIS&#34; which as you say ,and I agree is
totally IRRELEVANT ASWELL AS ERRONEOUS , and sucks all
your energy out.
I knew that I would find confirmation out there that
I was not the only one thinking like this . Your
letters have been great . I will check out that
Michigan place . Do You know where I can locate this
Dr. Bernarr?
Thanks again , Liz Nelson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brock, I totally agree. This is what I know in my<br />
heart , and I can&#8217;t accept the establishment line for<br />
my daughter , and I don&#8217;t want her to accept it either<br />
. It has been a really hard month , persisting with my<br />
belief and knowledge about healing whilst watching her<br />
go through acceptance/denial /evasion / hopelessness<br />
about &quot;THE DIAGNOSIS&quot; which as you say ,and I agree is<br />
totally IRRELEVANT ASWELL AS ERRONEOUS , and sucks all<br />
your energy out.<br />
I knew that I would find confirmation out there that<br />
I was not the only one thinking like this . Your<br />
letters have been great . I will check out that<br />
Michigan place . Do You know where I can locate this<br />
Dr. Bernarr?<br />
Thanks again , Liz Nelson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endy Smith</title>
		<link>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11499</link>
		<author>Endy Smith</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://diabetes.pocket-book.com/2004/08/12/type-1/#comment-11499</guid>
		<description>i've heard a ton of antecdotal evidence about people ignoring
their dr's advice on diabetes and living to be x-y-or z amount
of years old anyway. Hmph. i've also heard a testimonial from
a woman who claims that praying to her ($600) tammy faye baker doll
cured her of cancer.
i just think of how much longer they could have stayed around
if they'd had a little better sense.
if you don't trust your dr, find another one. some are better than others.
but for heaven sake don't trust antecdotal evidence alone on this subject.
remember you are reading the exceptions, not necessairily the norms.
doing 'whatever' might cure diabetes, but it's probably wiser to place your
bet on treatment and control and learning to live with it.
regards,
Dennis

&lt;!--more--&gt;
I believe one of the WORST problems with type 1 diabetes is simply
that people are told by their doctors: &#34;You have type 1 diabetes and
this is Not Curable and You Must be On Insulin for the rest of your
life...and your pancreas does not produce enough insulin and if you
don't take insulin....YOU WILL DIE!&#34;

Our minds are more powerful than any absolutes about what is and what
is not possible. When we buy into the &#34;incurable&#34; BS, we have in
essence lost. If your daughter read about Sergei Boutenko was
diagnosed as type 1 and never took an insulin shot, changed his diet,
and is a healthy, happy vibrant young man over 10 years later, she
will understand their is another possibility. I'm glad to see you
have the &#34;PH miracle for diabetes&#34;, this also shows the possibilities
for living drug and insulin free.

In David Wolfe's book, &#34;The Sunfood Diet Success System,&#34; he also
relates the story of a young lady who was a type 1, insulin dependant
diabetic who, after 7 months of a clean diet, no longer needed drugs.
She was coached by Dr Bernarr, who I have spoke with. He told me he
has had at least a dozen people he has worked with who got off of insulin.

A resource you should check out is The Creative Health Institute in
Michigan. They immerse you in a 2 week program and many miraculous
stories come out of that place. If feasible, your daughter and you
could stay on as volunteers after your stay to make the diet
transition easier. If I could hire a raw chef, I would. Everything
is easier when you work with and learn from an expert.

All the best,

Brock
PS. I forgot to mention, I am male, am married, have 2 children, am 39
and turned (or was diagnosed as) type 1 diabetic at 19 years old.

PSS. The idea of &#34;normal insulin levels&#34; is also debatable. The
doctor who was in the Biosphere found that the longest lived people
had very low levels of insulin in their bodies. Possibly this is
because they were better balanced than most and their bodies utilized
other means of regulating blood sugar. This doctor also noted that by
eating 30% less, the bodies health and energy INCREASES dramatically.
Possible this is why all these raw food vegans cure themselves of
diabetes, they are relieving some stress on the body.

By reading the messages of this group you agree to hold yourself FULLY
responsible FOR yourself.
Have a nice day !

SPONSORED LINKS
Diabetes supplies Diabetes test strips Diabetes Diabetes testing
supply Diabetes product Diabetes treatment

Visit your group &#34;diabetescured&#34; on the web.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve heard a ton of antecdotal evidence about people ignoring<br />
their dr&#8217;s advice on diabetes and living to be x-y-or z amount<br />
of years old anyway. Hmph. i&#8217;ve also heard a testimonial from<br />
a woman who claims that praying to her ($600) tammy faye baker doll<br />
cured her of cancer.<br />
i just think of how much longer they could have stayed around<br />
if they&#8217;d had a little better sense.<br />
if you don&#8217;t trust your dr, find another one. some are better than others.<br />
but for heaven sake don&#8217;t trust antecdotal evidence alone on this subject.<br />
remember you are reading the exceptions, not necessairily the norms.<br />
doing &#8216;whatever&#8217; might cure diabetes, but it&#8217;s probably wiser to place your<br />
bet on treatment and control and learning to live with it.<br />
regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
<p><!--more--><br />
I believe one of the WORST problems with type 1 diabetes is simply<br />
that people are told by their doctors: &quot;You have type 1 diabetes and<br />
this is Not Curable and You Must be On Insulin for the rest of your<br />
life&#8230;and your pancreas does not produce enough insulin and if you<br />
don&#8217;t take insulin&#8230;.YOU WILL DIE!&quot;</p>
<p>Our minds are more powerful than any absolutes about what is and what<br />
is not possible. When we buy into the &quot;incurable&quot; BS, we have in<br />
essence lost. If your daughter read about Sergei Boutenko was<br />
diagnosed as type 1 and never took an insulin shot, changed his diet,<br />
and is a healthy, happy vibrant young man over 10 years later, she<br />
will understand their is another possibility. I&#8217;m glad to see you<br />
have the &quot;PH miracle for diabetes&quot;, this also shows the possibilities<br />
for living drug and insulin free.</p>
<p>In David Wolfe&#8217;s book, &quot;The Sunfood Diet Success System,&quot; he also<br />
relates the story of a young lady who was a type 1, insulin dependant<br />
diabetic who, after 7 months of a clean diet, no longer needed drugs.<br />
She was coached by Dr Bernarr, who I have spoke with. He told me he<br />
has had at least a dozen people he has worked with who got off of insulin.</p>
<p>A resource you should check out is The Creative Health Institute in<br />
Michigan. They immerse you in a 2 week program and many miraculous<br />
stories come out of that place. If feasible, your daughter and you<br />
could stay on as volunteers after your stay to make the diet<br />
transition easier. If I could hire a raw chef, I would. Everything<br />
is easier when you work with and learn from an expert.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Brock<br />
PS. I forgot to mention, I am male, am married, have 2 children, am 39<br />
and turned (or was diagnosed as) type 1 diabetic at 19 years old.</p>
<p>PSS. The idea of &quot;normal insulin levels&quot; is also debatable. The<br />
doctor who was in the Biosphere found that the longest lived people<br />
had very low levels of insulin in their bodies. Possibly this is<br />
because they were better balanced than most and their bodies utilized<br />
other means of regulating blood sugar. This doctor also noted that by<br />
eating 30% less, the bodies health and energy INCREASES dramatically.<br />
Possible this is why all these raw food vegans cure themselves of<br />
diabetes, they are relieving some stress on the body.</p>
<p>By reading the messages of this group you agree to hold yourself FULLY<br />
responsible FOR yourself.<br />
Have a nice day !</p>
<p>SPONSORED LINKS<br />
Diabetes supplies Diabetes test strips Diabetes Diabetes testing<br />
supply Diabetes product Diabetes treatment</p>
<p>Visit your group &quot;diabetescured&quot; on the web.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
